![]() |
| Stephanie Wytovich & Zoje Stage |
![]() |
| Launch @ Riverstone |
I saw several friends at Riverstone who I hadn't seen in a while. And Barnes & Noble Settlers Ridge blew my mind with the largest display of my books that I've ever seen!
![]() |
| Stephanie Wytovich & Zoje Stage |
![]() |
| Launch @ Riverstone |
I saw several friends at Riverstone who I hadn't seen in a while. And Barnes & Noble Settlers Ridge blew my mind with the largest display of my books that I've ever seen!
"#Authorlife is—somehow—both a blistering satire and a joyous (though nail-biting) thrill ride. You will never look at your favorite authors the same. What a clever, astute, and fun novel. Five shining stars." (T. Greenwood, author of Everything Has Happened, The Still Point, and Keeping Lucy)
After selling
his first thriller novel for six figures, Mackenzie "Mack" Lane quit
his job as a journalist to become a full-time author. But now, a few years
later, his career is spiraling downward. With each book doing worse than the
last, he fears his status as a Boring White Dude is partly to blame. With his
bank accounts dwindling, Mack has to find a way to make more money: his ex-wife
wants to send their son to a private high school, and his current wife wants to
have a baby.
Mack begs his agent and editor to sing the praises of his new novel and do everything in their power to encourage his publisher's marketing team to make the book a bestseller. But as Pub Day for his fourth novel approaches—without the interviews and publicity he'd so hoped for—Mack knows his book is in trouble. And with it, his career and personal life.
Growing more desperate, Mack concocts a risky and more-or-less unethical idea for a publicity stunt. His agent, Wallis Wallace, reluctantly goes along with it—after all, if it works, she stands to gain 15% of his windfall. And if it doesn't work, Mack is the one who will suffer the consequences of being ridiculed and cancelled.
#AuthorLife is a satire about an author who gets the wrong sort of inspiration from his dying career—because publishing is a bloody hard business.
2026 marked the third time I attended Stokercon, but the first time I attended while embracing my reality of being on the autism spectrum. This is a new diagnosis for me, and some may say why bother with a diagnosis this late in the game? I will tell you why: Because it is liberating beyond words to finally understand why I've always felt so different—and to finally feel like it's okay to just be me instead of constantly trying to adhere to societal expectations.
This was by far my best Stokercon experience—in spite of a
stimulation level so intense I'd most accurately describe it as an ordeal.
But it was an ordeal I moved through as my genuine self, without masking or "faking
it." And that led to some truly enjoyable interactions with strangers.
I've always had issues with "small talk." What is
it? What is its purpose? Why do I want to waste my energy on empty chatter?
I've labeled myself "shy" for a long time, but the issue is deeper
than that. I can't "compete" in a group conversation. And there's
nothing about my natural abilities or inclinations that would lead me to
approach people in a party-like setting.
I accepted all of that this year, and found a place with a
small grouping of comfy seats where I could plop myself, out of the way, before
all of my Stokercon activities. But a rather amazing thing happened: People approached
me, and I had more conversations with strangers than I've ever had.
For the first time in my life I got to swap info about traits—about
needing hours to prepare to go somewhere, and getting stuck in waiting mode.
About the noise, the lights, the mayhem. About the difficulty in recognizing
faces. About the need for copious amounts of downtime. The overload of
Stokercon is hard for people on the spectrum—but it made for the perfect
opportunity to find kinship.
Have I ever been myself in public before??
I have spent my life "looking fine" to everyone.
Everywhere. All the time. Somewhere along the line, I learned that
"looking fine" was the way to go, to not seem the least bit
troublesome or needy. But you know what happens after decades of that? Your
needs are never met! Eventually I'd started to wonder what my needs actually
were. And I started to question if I had to remain the version of myself that
I—and others—have accepted as "me."
There are also some specific things about being on the
spectrum that made being a panelist at Stokercon quite challenging. As
mentioned above, I can't "compete" in a group conversation. There are always one or two people on panels that end up doing most of the talking—and I
can't interject myself. By the time I decide if I should speak up, the relevant
moment has passed. And I also came to realize—now that I'm coming to terms with
the realities of how I process things differently—that I don't always
understand the moderator's questions. Truly, my brain is sometimes interpreting
everything differently, and I found myself feeling like a contrarian because I
wasn't always on the same page as everyone else. 
With Christine Harrold
At this point I'm questioning if I should volunteer for any
panels when Stokercon returns to Pittsburgh next year. On the one hand, panels give
me somewhere specific to be (rather than sitting somewhere out of the way like
a lost person). On the other hand, there is this lingering sense that panels
are hard and stressful. I don't know; I have many months to decide. In the
meanwhile, I can entertain thoughts about my ongoing journey, and where it will
take me. And who I might be by the time Stokercon 2027 rolls around.